LoyalFans Agency Commission Study 2026

This LoyalFans agency commission study asked one question of every agency a set of web searches could surface: does it publish what it charges to manage a LoyalFans account? On 30 September 2026, nine agencies named LoyalFans as a platform they work on. None of them publishes a LoyalFans management rate. One publishes any percentage at all, and it prices an AI chat product.

What did the LoyalFans agency commission study find?

Finding	Result
Agencies that name LoyalFans and loaded on 30 September 2026	9
Publishing a rate for managing a LoyalFans account	0
Publishing any percentage	1 (30%, for an AI chat product)
Saying “commission” or “revenue share” with no figure	4
Charging a flat monthly fee, amount not published	1
Stating there is no upfront or setup fee	5
With a page dedicated to LoyalFans	1
Whose only LoyalFans evidence is a logo	3
Spanish and Portuguese agency sites that mention LoyalFans	0 of 12
Search-result entries checked in total	65 (64 distinct domains)

A second finding concerns attention rather than price. Only one agency has a page built around LoyalFans, and the two that write about it at length treat it as a side channel. MAHO Management writes that “across our 20+ creators, fewer than 5% of accounts run LoyalFans actively”. Outseeker, an agency blog that does not offer LoyalFans management, calls LoyalFans and ManyVids “not worth primary focus for most agencies”.

How was the study done?

We ran 33 queries through a web-search tool that returns United States results. They ranged from “loyalfans agency” and “loyalfans management agency” to “loyalfans chatter job”, with Spanish, Portuguese, German, French and Russian wording mixed in.

Every result that looked like an agency, chatting service or manager was opened on 30 September 2026 with curl and a desktop Chrome user agent. Sites that only render in the browser were read through a separate fetch tool (WebFetch). On each site we read the page the search returned, the homepage and any FAQ on them, and searched the text for LoyalFans, percentages, fee words (commission, revenue share, setup fee, retainer) and access words (password, login, payout, bank).

A site counted only if the business itself names LoyalFans as a platform it works on, whether in text, on its own page or as a platform logo, and the page loaded on the study date. Software tools, marketplaces and blogs that merely discuss LoyalFans were left out. Three further sites claimed LoyalFans in search snippets but either would not load or the claim could not be found on the live site, so they are not counted.

What does each agency publish about its price?

All read on 30 September 2026; quotes are exact.

Agency	How it names LoyalFans	What it publishes about price
Ofhoria	Dedicated LoyalFans page	No rate. “Private review. No upfront fee.”
ALLFANS	Lists LoyalFans with OnlyFans, Fansly, Fanvue and MYM	No rate
Only Gems Management	FAQ, plus a multi-platform blog post	No rate. “we earn a revenue share only when you earn”; “No joining fees, setup charges, or hidden costs.”
Big Bag Management	Homepage platform list	No rate. “We earn a percentage of your revenue”
MAHO Management	Blog post comparing LoyalFans and OnlyFans	No rate. Paid “exclusively through a share of your OnlyFans account revenue”
Amour	Logo in its platform strip	AI product: “You only pay 30% of what it sells”. Human team: rate agreed on the call, then put “in writing”
Boese VA	Logo in its platform strip	No rate. Entry bar of “at least $20,000+ in net revenue per month” or 20 paid fans a day
Limitless Talent	Partner logo	No rate
Cam Model Agency	Several LoyalFans guides	“a flat monthly rate”, amount not published

Which warning signs appeared, and how often?

Counted across the nine, from public pages only: one says creator payouts are processed on the agency’s side; one advertises multi-account and anti-ban infrastructure; two sell AI chatting, which LoyalFans’ acceptable use policy prohibits where AI talks to fans “without human oversight”; one asks creators to hold a prepaid token balance; and one charges a flat fee whatever the account earns. None asks for a creator’s password on its public pages.

Why do LoyalFans agencies keep their rates private?

The data cannot answer that, so this is our reading. Rates scale with the work, and a chat-only service, a full management team and a flat-fee adviser sell different things, so one number invites a false comparison. Most of these businesses sell OnlyFans management first, LoyalFans looks like an add-on for them, and few write a price for an add-on. A rate set on a call can also be fitted to the account in front of them, which a published range cannot.

We publish ours, 25%–50%, on our pricing page, and what LoyalFans agencies charge sets it against the studio split below.

What does LoyalFans itself take?

LoyalFans takes 20% of every fan payment, tips included and tax excluded, and pays the creator the remaining 80%. Both its Creator Supplement (last modified 10 July 2026) and its terms of service (8 July 2026) say so; we read them on 30 September 2026. Refunds and chargebacks come out of creator earnings, not out of the platform fee.

Studios get a published split of their own. LoyalFans sends 80% of earnings to the studio, the studio pays its creators, and the dashboard limits the studio-creator split to between 10% and 60%. LoyalFans does not state whether that rate applies to the 80% or to gross payments. More in how LoyalFans studios work.

What are the study’s limitations?

• The sample is what one US-only search tool returned for 33 queries. It is not a registry, and another engine or country would surface other sites.
• Direct scraping of Google, DuckDuckGo and Bing hit challenge pages, so ranking positions are unknown.
• Only landing pages, homepages and the FAQs on them were read. A rate on a deeper pricing page, in a PDF or inside an application form would be missed, and contract terms are invisible from outside.
• Three of the nine claim LoyalFans only through a logo and may not actively run LoyalFans accounts.
• ALLFANS renders in the browser and was read through WebFetch rather than from its raw HTML.
• Two sites presenting themselves as LoyalFans specialists could not be reached on the study date and should be checked again.
• Nine agencies is too few for an average or a “typical rate”, so we computed neither.
• Non-English coverage is thin. Spanish and Portuguese results came from three queries, and the searches returned no German, French, Italian or Russian agency results beyond one mixed-language query.

Who ran this study, and what is our interest?

Bunny Agency collected the data and wrote this page, and we sell LoyalFans management ourselves. That makes us an interested party: a finding that competitors publish no rate flatters an agency that does. Our own sites were recorded but excluded from every figure, and each source is linked and dated so anyone can repeat the check. You are welcome to quote the tables if you link back and keep the study date.